The marketing for automated trading tools is a wall of curves and jargon. None of it tells you whether a tool is safe to run. These six architectural questions do.

1. Non-custodial?

Does it run in your broker account via API, or does it want you to deposit money with it? Only the first is acceptable — you should always hold your own funds (managed vs non-custodial).

2. Risk controls you can see and set?

Can you configure position sizing, a hard stop, and exposure limits — and can you see the exit logic? A tool where you set the boundaries beats one that hides them (transparent rules). And it must have a real kill switch (fail-safes).

A great equity curve is the easiest thing in the world to fake. A non-custodial, transparent, risk-bounded architecture is not. Judge the thing that's hard to fake.

3-6. The rest

3. Honest about risk? Real tools state that trading carries risk of loss; hype hides it. 4. No return promises? Any "guaranteed profit" claim is disqualifying (scam tells). 5. Logged and auditable? Every action recorded in a journal you own. 6. You can switch it off instantly? Control is non-negotiable. NoVo is built to pass this checklist by design — non-custodial, your rules and risk, a full exit hierarchy, and your own trade journal (what NoVo is). See do trading bots really work.