Yes, some people make a living from algorithmic trading. Most who try don't. The difference isn't a secret indicator — it's capital, a genuine edge, and treating it like a business.

The math nobody advertises

To live on returns, you need enough capital that a realistic percentage return is a livable income — and enough buffer to survive drawdowns without being forced to stop. A great edge on a tiny account is a great edge on a tiny income. This is why undercapitalization sinks most attempts (how much you need, risk of ruin).

You need a real, durable edge

A strategy that worked last year can stop working as markets change. Making a living means continuously validating your edge and adapting — not running one static bot forever and hoping (volatility regimes, backtest vs forward test).

Full-time algo trading isn't passive income. It's a business — with a boss (the market) who fires you the moment you get complacent.

The honest bottom line

It's possible, but it's a job, not a lottery ticket: capital, a validated edge, ruthless risk control, and constant work. Anyone selling “quit your job with our AI bot” is selling the dream, not the reality (how to spot a scam). Start realistic — keep your income, trade small, and let results, not hope, decide if it scales (how to start algorithmic trading).